This land is my land, this land is your land

I have a hard time writing on here. First I have to attempt to form an opinion on complex issues, then I have to make sure it doesn't line up with yours, then I have to decide how provocative or melodramatic I should be (should I compare the Arizona law with Jews having to carry around their papers in Nazi Germany?)

I don't know much about the law, but you said it "instructs state law enforcement agencies to ascertain the citizenship status of anyone reasonably believed to be in the country illegally." Apart from watching somebody hop over a fence, I don't know many other ways that you can tell that someone is reasonably an illegal immigrant.

Statistically, if you take a large group of Hispanics and a large group of Caucasians, there will be many more illegal immigrants in the Hispanic group. This means if you're looking for illegal immigrants and you target Hispanic people you have a better chance at finding them. It's racial profiling, but it seems to work. It works in the short term at least. I don't know what the long term effects are on a nations image or on a group of its citizens when they are treated as second class.

You've painted a nice picture of illegal immigrants as people who come into our country with heads on pikes and leave them out as lawn ornaments, but I was watching the news on ksl last night and I got some different facts. While studies in Utah have been "inconclusive", on a federal level they are "definitive" that illegal immigrants have a positive impact on the economy. Also, while many think that they send all of the money they make back to their families in Mexico, the average amount of money sent is between 10 and 15 percent of their paycheck.

Can't the police already check out anybody who is acting legally suspicious? Do they really need a new law to remind them to check Hispanic people twice?
You say the country is being invaded by people who break our laws. If you're going for a technicality, then yes, every illegal immigrant has broken one law.
It's estimated that the population of Utah is about 4.8% illegal immigrants. The Utah State Prison (go aggies) only holds prisoners who have committed a felony. Over the past 8 years 5% of the prison population was undocumented immigrants. That means that an illegal immigrant is just as likely to commit a felony as any other Utahn, so beware of your neighbors.

I only have statistics for Utah, but I'm sure the problem is worse in Arizona. Senator Russell Pearce, the author of the Arizona bill, said, "They're rapists, they're drug runners, they're human smugglers." This criminalizes all undocumented immigrants and turns feelings of hate toward them, and not just those committing the crimes. When the only difference between a Hispanic US citizen and an undocumented immigrant is a piece of paper or place of birth it's easy to see why some Hispanic US citizens are feeling attacked.

I know you use the phrase, "shut up" a lot, but I think the legal Hispanic community has some legitimate concerns to be voiced.

*all numbers and statistics are from ksl

When a man [supposes he] loves a woman

There are people in the United States who participate in arranged marriages, but I'm assuming your point was that the whole western dating scene should be switched to one of arranged marriages.
You mention that dating wastes lots of time and money. If you're dating properly, I wouldn't consider time spent on dates as wasted time. You may not end up with your wife at the end of the night, but time spent dating is generally more fun (or at least interesting) then most daily tasks.
I'm assuming you're going to follow the "standard" family stereotype where the man will provide for the family, and the woman will take care of the kids and the house. All you have to pay for while dating is a bit of entertainment and food for another person a couple times a week. Once you get married you will be paying for another person's food, bills, housing, car, etc. Your money problems will just get worse. You're living the good life now, enjoy it while you can :)

I haven't spent too much money on dates, but I do feel that many girls have it easier financially during the "dating" years. Since guys are usually forced to be responsible for dating, you get to choose the cost and frequency of your dates. Dates don't need to be extravagant. You can simply go out for a cup of coffee (or a glass of milk). You've spent hundreds (possibly thousands) more than me on dates, but under the classification system of "not married" or "married" we are in the same position. I'm not planning on dieing alone either. (thanks e-harmony)

You are expecting way too many lifestyle changes from this new system of dating. I highly doubt that the few hours a week you spend dating are what's stopping you from writing a novel (in fact, being a published author would probably help your dating). Also, I doubt you've spent enough money on dating to finance an expedition to Everest, including the necessary training.
If most people had that extra time, they'd probably spend it doing more of what they already do (some extra tv time or time for more homework). Usually not doing something exciting with your life isn't due to a lack of time.

I remembered that there are some funny quotes from one of Jerry Seinfeld's stand-up acts where he talks about how surprised he is that so many people are getting married. Are that many people out there really just stumbling across the one person that is perfect for them and that they want to spend the rest of their life with?
I didn't happen to find the Seinfeld quotes, but I happened upon a different quote that sort of summarizes the pressure in the Mormon community (which is quite different from the people who have told me not to get married before 30).
Any young man who is unmarried at the age of twenty one is a menace to the community.-Brigham Young


These replies are taking a long time. I think we should write more frequent, but shorter, segments in the future. I'll just mention some other concerns of mine briefly.
You are relying on your parents to find you a mate. What about people who don't come from a family as nice as yours?
Instead of dating now, once you have kids you need to date around for their partners.
Isn't the history of arranged marriages usually just deals made for power/land/money/social influence, etc.
If you loose your parents before you're 25, who chooses your spouse?
People that are good together "on paper" might not like each other too much in person.
I agree that many people should spend longer considering if they are ready to get married or get a divorce. But is it better to separate from somebody who you are no longer happy with and get a fresh start, or just suffer through the rest of your life with them?
When you make divorce more unacceptable, people can try to get away with more without fear of ending the relationship. This can lead to abusive relationships that go on for too long because divorce is not an option.
I don't know how the low points in a relationship are when the marriage is arranged, but I bet the high points are a lot better when you're with somebody that you actually love.

"I suppose I love you"? Really? Is that what we're aiming for?